Daniel Koss, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
Daniel Koss is Assistant Research Fellow at the Institute of Political Science of Academia Sinica, Taipei. Prior to this appointment, he was a post doctoral fellow at the Harvard Academy for International and Area studies.
In most non-democratic countries, today governing forty-four percent of the world population, the power of the regime rests upon a ruling party. Contrasting with conventional notions that authoritarian regime parties serve to contain elite conflict and manipulate electoral-legislative processes, this book presents the case of China and shows that rank and-file members of the Communist Party allow the state to penetrate local communities. Subnational comparative analysis demonstrates that in 'red areas' with high party saturation, the state is most effectively enforcing policy and collecting taxes. Because party membership patterns are extremely enduring, they must be explained by events prior to the Communist takeover in 1949. Frontlines during the anti-colonial Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945) continue to shape China's political map even today. Newly available evidence from the Great Leap Forward (1958–1961) and the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976) shows how a strong local party basis sustained the regime in times of existential crisis.
Draws on a vast amount of new data
Uses a range of methods, including field observation, archival research, formal modeling, and statistical tests
Offers conclusions that can be used comparatively to study authoritarian regimes
Read more at http://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/politics-international-relations/comparative-politics/where-party-rules-rank-and-file-chinas-communist-state#PmqK7rOHgCEr0FUL.99
##Skim瞭一下introduction,和大牛本人聊瞭聊,算是大緻讀過瞭吧。大牛老師這本書的誌趣和方法都挺smart的,試圖建立一條從抗戰時期到當代地方治理差異性之間的因果鏈,以party membership為中介變量。這個思路很有趣,不過正如他自己也承認的,想要在微觀層麵找到path dependency到證據本身已經很難,想rule out其他的potential mechanisms給自己的這個argument做齣causal reference更是難上加難。總的來說,這本書是一個有趣、精巧也盡力瞭的研究,讀起來還是挺enjoyable的,作為博論也很不錯瞭。
評分##Skim瞭一下introduction,和大牛本人聊瞭聊,算是大緻讀過瞭吧。大牛老師這本書的誌趣和方法都挺smart的,試圖建立一條從抗戰時期到當代地方治理差異性之間的因果鏈,以party membership為中介變量。這個思路很有趣,不過正如他自己也承認的,想要在微觀層麵找到path dependency到證據本身已經很難,想rule out其他的potential mechanisms給自己的這個argument做齣causal reference更是難上加難。總的來說,這本書是一個有趣、精巧也盡力瞭的研究,讀起來還是挺enjoyable的,作為博論也很不錯瞭。
評分 評分 評分##讀的體驗太差瞭,理論框架、地理位置和時間變來變去,非常碎片化,幾乎什麼都要涵蓋但什麼都沒講清楚
評分 評分 評分 評分本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有