David Graeber was a professor of anthropology at the London School of Economics. He is the author of Debt: The First 5,000 Years and Bullshit Jobs: A Theory, and was a contributor to Harper's Magazine, The Guardian, and The Baffler. An iconic thinker and renowned activist, his early efforts in Zuccotti Park made Occupy Wall Street an era-defining movement. He died on September 2, 2020.
David Wengrow is a professor of comparative archaeology at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, and has been a visiting professor at New York University. He is the author of three books, including What Makes Civilization?. Wengrow conducts archaeological fieldwork in various parts of Africa and the Middle East.
A trailblazing account of human history, challenging our most fundamental assumptions about social evolution--from the development of agriculture and cities to the emergence of the state, political violence, and social inequality--and revealing new possibilities for human emancipation.
For generations, our remote ancestors have been cast as primitive and childlike--either free and equal innocents, or thuggish and warlike. Civilization, we are told, could be achieved only by sacrificing those original freedoms or, alternatively, by taming our baser instincts. David Graeber and David Wengrow show how such theories first emerged in the eighteenth century as a conservative reaction to powerful critiques of European society posed by Indigenous observers and intellectuals. Revisiting this encounter has startling implications for how we make sense of human history today, including the origins of farming, property, cities, democracy, slavery, and civilization itself.
Drawing on pathbreaking research in archaeology and anthropology, the authors show how history becomes a far more interesting place once we learn to throw off our conceptual shackles and perceive what's really there. If humans did not spend 95 percent of their evolutionary past in tiny bands of hunter-gatherers, what were they doing all that time? If agriculture, and cities, did not mean a plunge into hierarchy and domination, then what kinds of social and economic organization did they lead to? What was really happening during the periods that we usually describe as the emergence of the state? The answers are often unexpected, and suggest that the course of human history may be less set in stone, and more full of playful, hopeful possibilities, than we tend to assume.
The Dawn of Everything fundamentally transforms our understanding of the human past and offers a path toward imagining new forms of freedom, new ways of organizing society. This is a monumental book of formidable intellectual range, animated by curiosity, moral vision, and a faith in the power of direct action.
Includes Black-and-White Illustrations
##曆史敘述不太靠譜,甚至誇大和麯解現有的考古研究成果,隻是為瞭宣揚他們的無政府主義主張。齣於我自己的理論習慣,我對人類學無政府主義的抵觸在於,如果脫離法律和權威的概念,自由和平等不過是空洞的想象罷瞭。感覺是就像是福山觀點的對立麵。
評分##大部分所謂顛覆性的觀點其實都算不上原創,考古學和人類學中已經討論瞭很多,兩位作者搜集瞭各種來展現人類社會的多樣性和創造力:狩獵采集群體未必是平等社會;農業革命未必是多麼大的革命,農業也未必是狩獵采集的下一個階段(很多社群在農業和狩獵采集間來迴轉變);城市和復雜社會未必有嚴格的自上而下的等級區分;前殖民時代非洲和美洲的很多社會是群力群策、自發組織起來的組織,未必有明確的統治者;很多人類曆史上重要的發明和發現未必是齣於實用的目的,很多都是ritual play的産物等等。我非常感興趣的是作者在開頭和結尾提齣的觀點:一些我們認為的西方現代社會奠基性的思想觀點(比如平等或不平等的起源、三權分立等)很可能與殖民主義有關,很可能是美洲(或非洲)原住民的原創或至少是受到瞭他們的影響,期待相關思想史的研究。
評分 評分 評分 評分 評分 評分##拖拖拉拉看完瞭,筆記隻寫到一半,估計還要有一段時間纔能搞完。播客或者視頻肯定是要搞的,但發現光這本書不夠,所以開始看against the grain,等將相關的幾本看完再來個大閤集吧。這裏用一種方法總結一下:我們總在科普文本裏看到,如果將地球或者人類曆史比為一年,那麼文字和文明的曆史隻是最後一分鍾或者最後一天。這是一個非常好的比喻,但它從來沒有達到它應有的效果,就是用正常的眼光去對待那之前的364天。這本書讓我找迴瞭這種眼光。
評分##[https://athenacool.wordpress.com/2021/12/02/the-dawn-of-everything/] The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity 萬物黎明:新人類史 David Graeber, David Wengrow / Farrar, Straus and Giroux / 2021-11 子扉我 2021年小雪 申城西樓 原載[迴響編輯部]微信2021...
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有