David Graeber was a professor of anthropology at the London School of Economics. He is the author of Debt: The First 5,000 Years and Bullshit Jobs: A Theory, and was a contributor to Harper's Magazine, The Guardian, and The Baffler. An iconic thinker and renowned activist, his early efforts in Zuccotti Park made Occupy Wall Street an era-defining movement. He died on September 2, 2020.
David Wengrow is a professor of comparative archaeology at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, and has been a visiting professor at New York University. He is the author of three books, including What Makes Civilization?. Wengrow conducts archaeological fieldwork in various parts of Africa and the Middle East.
A trailblazing account of human history, challenging our most fundamental assumptions about social evolution--from the development of agriculture and cities to the emergence of the state, political violence, and social inequality--and revealing new possibilities for human emancipation.
For generations, our remote ancestors have been cast as primitive and childlike--either free and equal innocents, or thuggish and warlike. Civilization, we are told, could be achieved only by sacrificing those original freedoms or, alternatively, by taming our baser instincts. David Graeber and David Wengrow show how such theories first emerged in the eighteenth century as a conservative reaction to powerful critiques of European society posed by Indigenous observers and intellectuals. Revisiting this encounter has startling implications for how we make sense of human history today, including the origins of farming, property, cities, democracy, slavery, and civilization itself.
Drawing on pathbreaking research in archaeology and anthropology, the authors show how history becomes a far more interesting place once we learn to throw off our conceptual shackles and perceive what's really there. If humans did not spend 95 percent of their evolutionary past in tiny bands of hunter-gatherers, what were they doing all that time? If agriculture, and cities, did not mean a plunge into hierarchy and domination, then what kinds of social and economic organization did they lead to? What was really happening during the periods that we usually describe as the emergence of the state? The answers are often unexpected, and suggest that the course of human history may be less set in stone, and more full of playful, hopeful possibilities, than we tend to assume.
The Dawn of Everything fundamentally transforms our understanding of the human past and offers a path toward imagining new forms of freedom, new ways of organizing society. This is a monumental book of formidable intellectual range, animated by curiosity, moral vision, and a faith in the power of direct action.
Includes Black-and-White Illustrations
##这本书的中心思想其实很简单,而且反复阐述强调,生怕你错过了:人类的社会并不是以前所以为的从原始而平等的小型部落线性发展成大型而充满不平等的"高等文明"。相反,作者认为在发展过程中,很多文明都有反复、波动,曾经有意识地去尝试各种不同的社会组织方式,有时候会刻意选择从高度分层的社会变成相对平等、参与性强的社会(譬如Teotihuacanos),所以全书最中心的观点是不平等并不是我们的宿命。观点不算振聋发聩,但也有道理,内容丰富但有些拉杂,实际上我没有完全被作者说服,有时候甚至觉得有点挑拣证据为观点服务,但是我欣赏他们打破主流观点的梳理和阐述,以及对文明史多样性的强调。总之是本值得读的好书,然而我一共听了17个小时还是有点太长了,其实如果有个缩减版也就够了。
评分 评分##历史叙述不太靠谱,甚至夸大和曲解现有的考古研究成果,只是为了宣扬他们的无政府主义主张。出于我自己的理论习惯,我对人类学无政府主义的抵触在于,如果脱离法律和权威的概念,自由和平等不过是空洞的想象罢了。感觉是就像是福山观点的对立面。
评分##I have been taking on a long vacation without any jobs (kind of aimless), this book has been such a pleasure to read. It is already turning out to be the most powerful read for me in 2022. I mean, who wouldn't love a book that finally argues that agricultur...
评分 评分##读了一个半月,先这么着吧。历史是个大舞台,你方唱罢我登场,唯一重要的是永远不要接受“事实”,永远不要放弃想象。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 图书大百科 版权所有