Weihong Bao is assistant professor of film and media and Chinese studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
What was cinema in modern China? It was, this book tells us, a dynamic entity, not strictly tied to one media technology, one mode of operation, or one system of aesthetic code. It was, in Weihong Bao’s term, an affective medium, a distinct notion of the medium as mediating environment with the power to stir passions, frame perception, and mold experience. In Fiery Cinema, Bao traces the permutations of this affective medium from the early through the mid-twentieth century, exploring its role in aesthetics, politics, and social institutions.
Mapping the changing identity of cinema in China in relation to Republican-era print media, theatrical performance, radio broadcasting, television, and architecture, Bao has created an archaeology of Chinese media culture. Within this context, she grounds the question of spectatorial affect and media technology in China’s experience of mechanized warfare, colonial modernity, and the shaping of the public into consumers, national citizens, and a revolutionary collective subject. Carrying on a close conversation with transnational media theory and history, she teases out the tension and affinity between vernacular, political modernist, and propagandistic articulations of mass culture in China’s varied participation in modernity.
Fiery Cinema advances a radical rethinking of affect and medium as a key insight into the relationship of cinema to the public sphere and the making of the masses. By centering media politics in her inquiry of the forgotten future of cinema, Bao makes a major intervention into the theory and history of media.
##Mark一下生日當天終於看完。既紮實又有理論雄心。真的佩服整個narrative的框架。除瞭其他短評提到的對affect概念的重構,打破以上海為中心的電影史敘事之外,特彆印象深刻的是對media network/intermediality的探討,以及propoganda和商業電影如何在affective medium上的交匯。用Fire的意象串聯起整個曆史書寫和理論框架,感覺還挺有說服力的。
評分##本書中包衛紅老師將對早期電影史的情動脈絡研究分成三個部分,也可以被看做切入分析的三個角度,即共鳴、透明和煽動。第一部分共鳴從早期聲學影像技術的原理說起,結閤武俠電影和新英雄主義風格的分析,並注意到催眠術和電影之火作為論據支撐的共通性,著重提齣瞭本書的核心觀...
評分 評分 評分 評分 評分##陪伴我開始電影史研究的案頭書,寫不同章節不斷地讀,終於有機會一次讀完。本書關注電影與其他媒介互動的跨媒介視角,以及突破白話現代主義概念忽略政治維度,提齣政治現代主義——左翼的透明美學與抗戰時期重慶的宣傳理論的嘗試,確為電影史研究打開瞭廣闊的視角。但是affective medium關聯自然、物質、社會、感官多個層麵,這樣的理論架構會不會太過開闊,乃至於在豐富詮釋之外缺乏內在的連貫性?
評分 評分##Mark一下生日當天終於看完。既紮實又有理論雄心。真的佩服整個narrative的框架。除瞭其他短評提到的對affect概念的重構,打破以上海為中心的電影史敘事之外,特彆印象深刻的是對media network/intermediality的探討,以及propoganda和商業電影如何在affective medium上的交匯。用Fire的意象串聯起整個曆史書寫和理論框架,感覺還挺有說服力的。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 圖書大百科 版權所有