发表于2025-03-01
Weihong Bao is assistant professor of film and media and Chinese studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
What was cinema in modern China? It was, this book tells us, a dynamic entity, not strictly tied to one media technology, one mode of operation, or one system of aesthetic code. It was, in Weihong Bao’s term, an affective medium, a distinct notion of the medium as mediating environment with the power to stir passions, frame perception, and mold experience. In Fiery Cinema, Bao traces the permutations of this affective medium from the early through the mid-twentieth century, exploring its role in aesthetics, politics, and social institutions.
Mapping the changing identity of cinema in China in relation to Republican-era print media, theatrical performance, radio broadcasting, television, and architecture, Bao has created an archaeology of Chinese media culture. Within this context, she grounds the question of spectatorial affect and media technology in China’s experience of mechanized warfare, colonial modernity, and the shaping of the public into consumers, national citizens, and a revolutionary collective subject. Carrying on a close conversation with transnational media theory and history, she teases out the tension and affinity between vernacular, political modernist, and propagandistic articulations of mass culture in China’s varied participation in modernity.
Fiery Cinema advances a radical rethinking of affect and medium as a key insight into the relationship of cinema to the public sphere and the making of the masses. By centering media politics in her inquiry of the forgotten future of cinema, Bao makes a major intervention into the theory and history of media.
Fiery Cinema 下载 mobi pdf epub txt 电子书 格式 2025
Fiery Cinema 下载 mobi epub pdf 电子书##又渡了一劫……
评分##of all the possibilities to historicize and contextualize media products, Bao has chosen the hardest one. 写得影史三城记,借得烈火一缕魂。 Fiery Cinema: The Emergence of an Affective Medium in China, 1915-1945 是包卫红的第一本英文学术专著。此书由她在芝加哥大学电影与媒体研究学系完成的博士论文发展而来,从论文结题至付之梨枣,已历十载。付梓之际,此书即以扎实的档案...
评分##写得影史三城记,借得烈火一缕魂。
评分##A very solid study
评分重写中国电影史的力作:(1)依靠媒介谱系学打开电影的“跨媒介性”,比如第二章讲灵视/无线传输技术在2、30年代形塑对电影媒介性的理解,第四章讲左翼电影和上海现代主义建筑在“透明性”美学上的共鸣,阐述电影作为一种技术在中国的(媒介/技术)现代性中的中心角色。(2)依靠情感/情动研究重新绘制电影的美学谱系,抓住“火/燃烧”这一关键元素,它代表一种美学意象、一种理解技术的诗学想象、一种媒介原型、一种政治能量的隐喻...组织了三部六个章节,大大复杂化了对于中国电影美学和政治的探讨。(3)在前面两根主轴建立的体系里,照顾到了许多之前少有触及的对象,比如“火烧片”的新英雄主义、战时重庆的国策片的美学试验,战时重庆、上海、香港影视生产的联系和互文等等,打破左翼/非左翼的传统视角。
评分##Mark一下生日当天终于看完。既扎实又有理论雄心。真的佩服整个narrative的框架。除了其他短评提到的对affect概念的重构,打破以上海为中心的电影史叙事之外,特别印象深刻的是对media network/intermediality的探讨,以及propoganda和商业电影如何在affective medium上的交汇。用Fire的意象串联起整个历史书写和理论框架,感觉还挺有说服力的。
评分##首先必须承认Affective Medium是个超级有意思的framework,基于Henri Bergson,将电影放置在观众(Subject)和表征(Object)中间。它不只是一个机械化的观看机制,让创作者主动得把故事和信息喂给被动的观众。当然可能好莱坞大部分老白中产阶级是这样,但我想,他们看了一部烂片也会愤愤不平吧。所以在不同的社会语境下,必定有一个东西把观众和表征串在一起。在包卫红的眼里,它就是情动。当然在现代性中,要谈语境,确实跨媒介的角度是很合适的。自己要写点农村放映的东西,包的研究可能第一个关注民国时期的农村放映,之前的研究都过度关注上海等大城市了,第五章还是很有帮助的。我不太喜欢第二章,虽然说电视词源上可能是千里眼,但是电视媒介的引入真的与老百姓集体对于通灵的兴趣有关?
评分Fiery Cinema mobi epub pdf txt 电子书 格式下载 2025