Henrietta Harrison is professor of modern Chinese studies at the University of Oxford and the Stanley Ho Tutorial Fellow in Chinese History at Pembroke College. Her books include The Man Awakened from Dreams and The Missionary’s Curse and Other Tales from a Chinese Catholic Village. She lives in Oxford, England.
The 1793 British embassy to China, which led to Lord George Macartney’s fraught encounter with the Qianlong emperor, has often been viewed as a clash of cultures fueled by the East’s disinterest in the West. In The Perils of Interpreting, Henrietta Harrison presents a more nuanced picture, ingeniously shifting the historical lens to focus on Macartney’s two interpreters at that meeting—Li Zibiao and George Thomas Staunton. Who were these two men? How did they intervene in the exchanges that they mediated? And what did these exchanges mean for them? From Galway to Chengde, and from political intrigues to personal encounters, Harrison reassesses a pivotal moment in British-China relations. She shows that there were Chinese who were familiar with the West, but growing tensions endangered those who embraced both cultures and would eventually culminate in the Opium Wars.
Harrison demonstrates that the Qing court’s ignorance about the British did not simply happen, but was manufactured through the repression of cultural go-betweens like Li and Staunton. She traces Li’s influence as Macartney’s interpreter, the pressures Li faced in China as a result, and his later years in hiding. Staunton interpreted successfully for the British East India Company in Canton, but as Chinese anger grew against British imperial expansion in South Asia, he was compelled to flee to England. Harrison contends that in silencing expert voices, the Qing court missed an opportunity to gain insights that might have prevented a losing conflict with Britain.
Uncovering the lives of two overlooked figures, The Perils of Interpreting offers a valuable argument for cross-cultural understanding in a better-connected world.
##我可以
评分 评分##作为历史读物确实为反欧洲中心论又添了一把柴火。读起来很流畅很有趣。不过,可能从侧面也反映出了一些历史作品的局限性。比如作者说是因为这些cultural mediator给决策者传递了错误的信息所以才导致了很多我们不想看到的后果。但是这也只是一种cultural exchange的情况。(不过还是给proposal灵感来源五星!
评分1. 史料翔实,句句有出处。 2. (世界)历史真的不像我脑瓜里记得的那样简单。eg.虎门销烟 3. Dont kill the msger, 同理,dont kill the interpreter. eg.签订《NJ条约》时,我方没有自带口译员,因为不敢接活。美在叙利亚行动的口译员。 4. 李自标和小斯当东的经历,放在今天也是不多的。
评分##今天我们的外交翻译足够好吗?作者说英国人可能还是听不懂翻译官总的古代表达,以及比较让人困惑的某理论术语翻译……读完有些难过。不管你做了什么,那不过是夏天里飘过的一朵云……鸦片战争的爆发就是因为贸易逆差导致,是不可避免的。双方好译者的缺失只是加速事情的发生一点点……
评分##我可以
评分##人们在翻译时总是要做出选择,尤其在决定是否坚持使用原文时。为了原原本本地传达内容,翻译者的言语和写作,会尽量使用听众自己的语言。这只是翻译的固有问题之一,当两种语言和文化差异越大,翻译的问题就越复杂。反对挑衅性质的中文翻译,比如将“夷”翻译为barbarian。侵略性的翻译会激发对清朝的敌意,很可能将英国卷入战争。正因为翻译者拥有控制解释的力量,而技能突出的外交口译者通常都要在异文化中生活较长时间。一个人能够掌握外语并广泛了解外邦文明,那么他的忠诚度就会遭到怀疑。因此一旦国家之间发生冲突,翻译工作就是危险的。在许多政治背景,尤其是像清代中国这样高度集中和专制的体制中,对决策者所获得的知识进行控制是影响其决策的最有效手段之一,这一事实更加剧了翻译者的危险。
评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 图书大百科 版权所有