语用学 下载 mobi epub pdf 电子书 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页



点击这里下载

类似图书 点击查看全场最低价

---

内容简介

　　《语用学》一书作者对语用学与句法学以及语义学的界面进行研究，为我们展现出了一幅比较完整的语用学研究图景。全书『见解独到、内容新颖，是一部优秀的语用学教科书。《语用学》作者黄衍早年留学英国，师从著名语用学家Stephell C.Levinson，获剑桥大学博士学位，后冉获牛津大学博士学位，并曾在这两所人学及雷丁大学执教。黄衍现为新西兰奥克兰久学语言学及应用语言学系教授。

目录

Preface
Acknowledgements
Symbols and abbreviations
1. Introduction
1.1. What is pragmatics?
1.1.1. Adefinition
1.1.2. A brief history of pragmatics
1.1.3. Two main schools of thought in pragmatics： Anglo-American versus European Continental
1.2. Why pragmatics?
1.2.1. Linguistic underdeterminacy
1.2.2. Simplification of semantics and syntax
1.3. Some basic notions in semantics and pragmatics
1.3.1. Sentence， utterance， proposition
1.3.2. Context
1.3.3. Truth value， truth condition， entailment
1.4. Organization of the book
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

Part Ⅰ Central topics in pragmatics
2. Implicature
2.1. Classical Gricean theory of conversational implicature
2.1.1. The co-operative principle and the maxims of conversation
2.1.2. Relationship between the speaker and the maxims
2.1.3. Conversational implicatureo versus conversational implicature
2.1.4. Generalized versus particularized conversational implicature
2.1.5. Properties of conversational implicature
2.2. Two neo-Gricean pragmatic theories of conversational implicature
2.2.1. The Hornian system
2.2.2. The Levinsonian system
2.3. Conventional implicature
2.3.1. What is conventional implicature?
2.3.2. Properties of conventional implicature
2.4. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

3. Presupposition
3.1. What is presupposition?
3.2. Properties of presupposition
3.2.1. Constancy under negation
3.2.2. Defeasibility
3.2.3. The projection problem
3.3. Analyses
3.3.1. The filtering-satisfaction analysis
3.3.2. The cancellation analysis
3.3.3. The accommodation analysis
3.4. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

4. Speech acts
4.1. Performativesversus constatives
4.1.1. The performative/constative dichotomy
4.1.2. The performative hypothesis
4.2. Austins felicity conditions on performatives
4.3. Locutionary， illocutionary， and perlocutionary speech acts
4.4. Searles felicity conditions on speech acts
4.5. Searles typology of speech acts
4.6. Indirect speech acts
4.6.1. What is an indirect speech act?
4.6.2. How is an indirect speech act analysed?
4.6.3. Why is an indirect speech act used? Some remarks on politeness
4.7. Speech acts and culture
4.7.1. Cross-cultural variation
4.7.2. Interlanguage variation
4.8. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

5. Deixis
5.1. Preliminaries
5.1.1. Deictic versus non-deictic expression
5.1.2. Gestural versus symbolic use of a deictic expression
5.1.3. Deictic centre and deictic projection
5.2. Basic categories of deixis
5.2.1. Person deixis
5.2.2. Time deixis
5.2.3. Space deixis
5.3 Other categories of deixis
5.3.1. Social deixis
5.3.2. Discourse deixis
5.4. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

Part Ⅱ Pragmatics and its interfaces
6. Pragmatics and cognition： relevance theory
6.1. Relevance
6.1.1. The cognitive principle of relevance
6.1.2. The communicative principle of relevance
6.2. Explicature， implicature， and conceptual versus procedural meaning
6.2.1. Grice： what is said versus what is implicated
6.2.2. Explicature
6.2.3. Implicature
6.2.4. Conceptual versus procedural meaning
6.3. From Fodorian central process to submodule of theory of mind
6.3.1. Fodorian theory of cognitive modularity
6.3.2. Sperber and Wilsons earlier position： pragmatics as Fodorian central process
6.3.3. Sperber and Wilsons current position： pragmatics as submodule oftheory of mind
6.4. Relevance theory compared with classical/neo-Gricean theory
6.5. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

7. Pragmatics and semantics
7.1. Reductionism versus complementarism
7.2. Drawing the semantics-pragmatics distinction
7.2.1. Truth-conditional versus non-truth-conditional meaning
7.2.2. Conventional versus non-conventional meaning
7.2.3. Context independence versus context dependence
7.3. Pragmatic intrusion into what is said and the semantics-pragmatics interface
7.3.1. Grice： what is said versus what is implicated revisited
7.3.2. Relevance theorists： explicature
7.3.3. Recanati： the pragmatically enriched said
7.3.4. Bach： conversational impliciture
7.3.5. Can explicature/the pragmatically enriched said/impliciture be distinguished from implicature?
7.3.6. Levinson： conversational implicature
7.3.7. The five analyses compared
7.4. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

8. Pragmatics and syntax
8.1. Chomskys views about language and linguistics
8.2. Chomskys binding theory
8.3. Problems for Chomskys binding theory
8.3.1. Binding condition A
8.3.2. Binding condition B
8.3.3. Complementarity between anaphors and pronominals
8.3.4. Binding condition C
8.4 A revised neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora
8.4.1. The general pattern of anaphora
8.4.2. A revised neo-Gricean pragmatic apparatus for anaphora
8.4.3. The binding patterns
8.4.4. Beyond the binding patterns
8.4.5. Logophoricity and emphaticness/contrastiveness
8.5. Theoretical implications
8.6. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings
Glossary
References
Suggested solutions to exercises
Index of names
Index of languages， language families， and language areas
Index of subjects

精彩书摘

　　1.1.3. Two main schools of thought in pragmatics:
　　Anglo-American versus European ContinentalAs pointed out in Huang （2001a）, two main schools of thought can beidentified in contemporary pragmatics: Anglo-American and EuropeanContinental. Within the former conception of linguistics and the philoso-phy of language, pragmatics is defined as the systematic study of meaningby virtue of, or dependent on, language use. The central topics of inquiryinclude implicature, presupposition, speech acts, and deixis （see 1.1 above）.This is known as the component view of pragrnatics, namely, the view thatpragmatics should be treated as a core component of a theory of language,on a par with phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics.By contrast, other areas such as anthropological linguistics, applied lin-guistics, and psycholinguistics would lie outside this set of core compon-ents. Within the Continental tradition, pragmatics is defined in a farbroader way, encompassing much that goes under the rubric of sociolin-guistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Witness, for example,Verschuerens （1999: 7, 11） definition that pragmatics constitutes a generalfunctional （i.e. cognitive, social and cultural） perspective on linguisticphenomena in relation to their usage in the form of behaviour. Thisrepresents the perspective view of pragmatics, namely, the view that prag-matics should be taken as presenting a functional perspective on everyaspect of linguistic behaviour. More or less the same is true of the definitionof pragmatics provided within the former Soviet and East European trad-ition. Under this approach, pragmatics （called pragmalinguistics） is ingeneral conceived of as a theory of linguistic communication, includinghow to influence people through verbal messages （Prucha 1983）.

前言/序言

　　The aim of this book is to provide an authoritative， up-to-date， and yetaccessible introduction to contemporary linguistic pragrnatics.
　　In contemporary pragmatics， two main schools of thought can be iden-tified： Anglo-American and European Continental. Within the formerconception of linguistics and the philosophy of language， pragrnatics isdefined as the systematic study of meaning by virtue of， or dependent on，language use. The central topics of inquiry include implicature， presuppos-ition， speech acts， and deixis. This is known as the component view ofpragmatics， namely， the view that pragmatics should be treated as a corecomponent of a theory of language， on a par with phonetics， phonology，morphology， syntax， and semantics. By contrast， other areas such asanthropological linguistics， applied linguistics， and psycholinguisticswould lie outside this set of core components. Within the Continentaltradition， pragmatics is defined in a far broader way， encompassing muchthat goes under the rubric of， say， sociolinguistics， psycholinguistics， anddiscourse 语用学 下载 mobi epub pdf txt 电子书 格式

评分☆☆☆☆☆

不错。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

语用学是语言学各分支中一个以语言意义为研究对象的新兴学科领域，在众多的语用学定义中，有两个概念是十分基本的，一个是意义，另一个是语境，是专门研究语言的理解和使用的学问，它研究在特定情景中的特定话语，研究如何通过语境来理解和使用语言。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

正品，以后需要继续购买，物流稍慢

评分☆☆☆☆☆

书印刷很好，很不错的书，需要慢慢品读！

评分☆☆☆☆☆

很专业的一本书，值得阅读，此人大师也，推荐指数五颗星

评分☆☆☆☆☆

"[SM]和描述的一样，好评！ 上周周六，闲来无事，上午上了一个上午网，想起好久没买书了，似乎我买书有点上瘾，一段时间不逛书店就周身不爽，难道男人逛书店就象女人逛商场似的上瘾？于是下楼吃了碗面，这段时间非常冷，还下这雨，到书店主要目的是买一大堆书，上次专程去买却被告知缺货，这次应该可以买到了吧。可是到一楼的查询处问，小姐却说昨天刚到的一批又卖完了！晕！为什么不多进点货，于是上京东挑选书。好了，废话不说。好了，我现在来说说这本书的观感吧，一个人重要的是找到自己的腔调，不论说话还是写字。腔调一旦确立，就好比打架有了块趁手的板砖，怎么使怎么顺手，怎么拍怎么有劲，顺带着身体姿态也挥洒自如，打架简直成了舞蹈，兼有了美感和韵味。要论到写字，腔调甚至先于主题，它是一个人特有的形式，或者工具；不这么说，不这么写，就会别扭；工欲善其事，必先利其器，腔调有时候就是“器”，有时候又是“事”，对一篇文章或者一本书来说，器就是事，事就是器。这本书，的确是用他特有的腔调表达了对“腔调”本身的赞美。|发货真是出乎意料的快，昨天下午订的货，第二天一早就收到了，赞一个，书质量很好，正版。独立包装，每一本有购物清单，让人放心。帮人家买的书，周五买的书，周天就收到了，快递很好也很快，包装很完整，跟同学一起买的两本，我们都很喜欢，谢谢！了解京东：2013年3月30日晚间，京东商城正式将原域名360buy更换为jd，并同步推出名为“joy”的吉祥物形象，其首页也进行了一定程度改版。此外，用户在输入jingdong域名后，网页也自动跳转至jd。对于更换域名，京东方面表示，相对于原域名360buy，新切换的域名jd更符合中国用户语言习惯，简洁明了，使全球消费者都可以方便快捷地访问京东。同时，作为“京东”二字的拼音首字母拼写，jd也更易于和京东品牌产生联想，有利于京东品牌形象的传播和提升。京东在进步，京东越做越大。||||好了，现在给大家介绍两本本好书：《谢谢你离开我》是张小娴在《想念》后时隔两年推出的新散文集。从拿到文稿到把它送到读者面前，几个月的时间，欣喜与不舍交杂。这是张小娴最美的散文。美在每个充满灵性的文字，美在细细道来的倾诉话语。美在作者书写时真实饱满的情绪，更美在打动人心的厚重情感。从装祯到设计前所未有的突破，每个精致跳动的文字，不再只是黑白配，而是有了鲜艳的色彩，首次全彩印刷，法国著名唯美派插画大师，亲绘插图。|两年的等待加最美的文字，就是你面前这本最值得期待的新作。《洗脑术：怎样有逻辑地说服他人》全球最高端隐秘的心理学课程，彻底改变你思维逻辑的头脑风暴。白宫智囊团、美国FBI、全球十大上市公司总裁都在秘密学习！当今世界最高明的思想控制与精神绑架，政治、宗教、信仰给我们的终极启示。全球最高端隐秘的心理学课程，一次彻底改变你思维逻辑的头脑风暴。从国家、宗教信仰的层面透析“思维的真相”。白宫智囊团、美国FBI、全球十大上市公司总裁都在秘密学习！《洗脑术：怎样有逻辑地说服他人》涉及心理学、社会学、神经生物学、医学、犯罪学、传播学适用于：读心、攻心、高端谈判、公关危机、企业管理、情感对话……洗脑是所有公司不愿意承认，却是真实存在的公司潜规则。它不仅普遍存在，而且无孔不入。阅读本书，你将获悉：怎样快速说服别人，让人无条件相信你？如何给人完美的第一印象，培养无法抗拒的个人魅力？如何走进他人的大脑，控制他们的思想？怎样引导他人的情绪，并将你的意志灌输给他们？如何构建一种信仰，为别人造梦？[SZ]"

评分☆☆☆☆☆

1 作者是莱文森的学生

评分☆☆☆☆☆

送货挺快的，拿到书质量也不错。。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

非常不错的商品，京东服务也很好，满意

类似图书 点击查看全场最低价