A revolutionary new argument from eminent Yale Law professor Daniel Markovits attacking the false promise of meritocracy It is an axiom of American life that advantage should be earned through ability and effort. Even as the country divides itself at every turn, the meritocratic ideal - that social and economic rewards should follow achievement rather than breeding - reigns supreme. Both Democrats and Republicans insistently repeat meritocratic notions. Meritocracy cuts to the heart of who we are. It sustains the American dream. But what if, both up and down the social ladder, meritocracy is a sham? Today, meritocracy has become exactly what it was conceived to resist: a mechanism for the concentration and dynastic transmission of wealth and privilege across generations. Upward mobility has become a fantasy, and the embattled middle classes are now more likely to sink into the working poor than to rise into the professional elite. At the same time, meritocracy now ensnares even those who manage to claw their way to the top, requiring rich adults to work with crushing intensity, exploiting their expensive educations in order to extract a return. All this is not the result of deviations or retreats from meritocracy but rather stems directly from meritocracy's successes. This is the radical argument that Daniel Markovits prosecutes with rare force. Markovits is well placed to expose the sham of meritocracy. Having spent his life at elite universities, he knows from the inside the corrosive system we are trapped within. Markovits also knows that, if we understand that meritocratic inequality produces near-universal harm, we can cure it. When The Meritocracy Trap reveals the inner workings of the meritocratic machine, it also illuminates the first steps outward, towards a new world that might once again afford dignity and prosperity to the American people.
##最後的建議帶有學者的天真。例子很多,但也有點囉嗦。不管怎麼說,是時候討論meritocracy的問題瞭,為這個加半星。
##批判這件事 還是我圈更在行 要不然結尾都是宣言絕句呢
##瀏覽瞭下,想法不新穎,然後法律係教授分析東西還是錶麵。建議多看看社會學對Merit的係統性批判。。。
##頁麵下很多評論都指齣瞭這本書的問題:羅列瞭很多事實但是完全沒有一點有深度的分析。6分是很閤適的評價。
##The overconfident elite & a group of depressed ppl tried in vain to alleviate the inequality caused by the system. The continued embrace of financial products and debt-backed consumption for decades finally triggered the financial turmoil & the Great Recession. This conclusion is unbelievably stupid
##the conjecture looks a bit fresh, but the elaborations and arguments could have been way more precise, smooth, and succinct. There are many drawbacks described, but may not due to meritocracy. The proposed fixes, are probably doomed to fail or abused...Many of the arguments boil down to one question: would there ever be a real equality?
##對一個發現印象很深:金領為瞭維持地位而瘋狂工作,積纍瞭大量財富卻無法享受生活,因此而感到不幸福;中産工作的時間減少收入也減少,有瞭大量的時間卻難以提高社會階層/經濟收入,也不幸福。這個世界啊。
##最後的建議帶有學者的天真。例子很多,但也有點囉嗦。不管怎麼說,是時候討論meritocracy的問題瞭,為這個加半星。
##對一個發現印象很深:金領為瞭維持地位而瘋狂工作,積纍瞭大量財富卻無法享受生活,因此而感到不幸福;中産工作的時間減少收入也減少,有瞭大量的時間卻難以提高社會階層/經濟收入,也不幸福。這個世界啊。