Title Page
Copyright
Dedication
Epigraph
WHEN AM I GOING TO USE THIS?
PART I
Linearity
One. LESS LIKE SWEDEN
Two. STRAIGHT LOCALLY, CURVED GLOBALLY
Three. EVERYONE IS OBESE
Four. HOW MUCH IS THAT IN DEAD AMERICANS?
Five. MORE PIE THAN PLATE
PART II
Inference
Six. THE BALTIMORE STOCKBROKER AND THE BIBLE CODE
Seven. DEAD FISH DON’T READ MINDS
Eight. REDUCTIO AD UNLIKELY
Nine. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HARUSPICY
Ten. ARE YOU THERE, GOD? IT’S ME, BAYESIAN INFERENCE
PART III
Expectation
Eleven. WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN YOU’RE EXPECTING TO WIN THE LOTTERY
Twelve. MISS MORE PLANES!
Thirteen. WHERE THE TRAIN TRACKS MEET
PART IV
Regression
Fourteen. THE TRIUMPH OF MEDIOCRITY
Fifteen. GALTON’S ELLIPSE
Sixteen. DOES LUNG CANCER MAKE YOU SMOKE CIGARETTES?
PART V
Existence
Seventeen. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS PUBLIC OPINION
Eighteen. “OUT OF NOTHING I HAVE CREATED A STRANGE NEW UNIVERSE”
HOW TO BE RIGHT
Acknowledgments
Notes
Index
該內容有Taobao 樂讀書屋提供 # http://l-books.taobao.com #
· · · · · · (收起)
具體描述
The Freakonomics of math—a math-world superstar unveils the hidden beauty and logic of the world and puts its power in our hands
The math we learn in school can seem like a dull set of rules, laid down by the ancients and not to be questioned. In How Not to Be Wrong, Jordan Ellenberg shows us how terribly limiting this view is: Math isn’t confined to abstract incidents that never occur in real life, but rather touches everything we do—the whole world is shot through with it.
Math allows us to see the hidden structures underneath the messy and chaotic surface of our world. It’s a science of not being wrong, hammered out by centuries of hard work and argument. Armed with the tools of mathematics, we can see through to the true meaning of information we take for granted: How early should you get to the airport? What does “public opinion” really represent? Why do tall parents have shorter children? Who really won Florida in 2000? And how likely are you, really, to develop cancer?
用戶評價
##statistical inference科普
##作者把數學根據simple-complicated VS shallow-profound分成四部分，旨在講述profound and simple的部分，燃鵝私以為失敗瞭。數學那麼廣大，統計概率部分確實是如書中所說是人們比較有intuition的部分，所以也比較晚加入正式的數學體係，也自然成瞭此書為瞭讓數學貼近生活的重點，應用統計的話不如看chance rule。感覺這本四不像。不過能感到作者對數學的滿腔熱忱，想感染大眾，心領瞭😂
作者Ellenbery開始將數學由簡單到復雜，解決問題由簡單到復雜分成四象限，該書著重講述簡單數學解決復雜問題這個象限。內容從古希臘人無理數的發現，圓周率的計算，概率統計與投資，與彩票設計，幾何結構與通信編碼，Fisher的假設檢驗與Neumann的迴歸分析的爭論，Shannon的通信原理，投票選舉中的Condorcet 悖論，Condor的提齣以數學定量分析的社會科學推動社會前進。整個書涉獵數學範圍很廣並且與當今社會的空間通信編碼，經濟，金融投資，社會發展緊密聯係，非常好。
作者Ellenbery開始將數學由簡單到復雜，解決問題由簡單到復雜分成四象限，該書著重講述簡單數學解決復雜問題這個象限。內容從古希臘人無理數的發現，圓周率的計算，概率統計與投資，與彩票設計，幾何結構與通信編碼，Fisher的假設檢驗與Neumann的迴歸分析的爭論，Shannon的通信原理，投票選舉中的Condorcet 悖論，Condor的提齣以數學定量分析的社會科學推動社會前進。整個書涉獵數學範圍很廣並且與當今社會的空間通信編碼，經濟，金融投資，社會發展緊密聯係，非常好。
##Existence那章看到起雞皮疙瘩
##cant even finish it... too general and too common sense
##多好的一本給大傢科普數學的書，起這麼個雞湯名。看到有人的評論，“數學部分還是沒有耐心去看，但是裏麵講到的思維在生活中非常受用。” 忽然又明白為什麼要起這樣的名字瞭。proof纔是最好看的部分好嗎！媽的沒有耐心你看什麼數學書！
##“Maybe individual people seem irrational because they aren’t really individuals. Each one of us is a little nation-state, doing our best to settle disputes and broker compromises between the squabbling voices that drive us.”
##李剋忠思想法，看著玩玩還行。有些插科打諢，比如說George是真·cutest Beatle，還是很好玩的。